To Lengthen or Revise: Reevaluating Anterior Acetabular Overhang Thresholds in Iliopsoas Impingement After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

J Bone Joint Surg Am · Oct 09 2026 · Recent

Clark DS, Kelly JJ, Yanamala SR, Helgeson EE, Trousdale RT, Levy BA, et al.

Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONArthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening gave satisfactory outcomes after THA regardless of the 8-mm acetabular overhang threshold, with low revision rates, supporting it as first-line surgery for refractory iliopsoas impingement.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) is a known cause of persistent anterior hip pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Management of IPI has often relied on an 8-mm anterior acetabular overhang threshold to guide operative treatment, favoring acetabular revision for greater overhang and iliopsoas tenotomy for lesser overhang. These thresholds were initially established on the basis of the outcomes of open tenotomy, and now, with an improved understanding of IPI and the advent of arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IPFL), a review of the 8-mm threshold is warranted.

METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent arthroscopic IPFL following primary THA between 2017 and 2024, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Acetabular overhang was measured for all patients using cross-table lateral radiographs, and patients were stratified into <8-mm and ≥8-mm cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures, reoperations, revisions, and complications were collected and analyzed on the basis of both the classic 8-mm threshold and continuous statistical methods.

RESULTS: We evaluated 86 hips undergoing IPFL. There were 83 patients (30 men and 53 women), with a mean age of 63.0 ± 11.2 years; with regard to race, 80 patients were White, 1 patient was Black or African American, and 2 patients listed other race or chose not to disclose. The acetabular overhang was <8 mm for 67 hips and ≥8 mm for 19 hips. The mean follow-up was 2.5 ± 1.6 years (range, 1 to 7.5 years). When comparing patients with <8-mm and ≥8-mm acetabular overhang, we observed no significant differences (p > 0.06) in the preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, modified Harris hip score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Tegner activity level, subjective groin pain improvement, subjective hip flexion strength improvement, and overall satisfaction. Reoperation (2.9% compared with 10.5%; p = 0.210) and acetabular revision rates (1.5% compared with 5%; p = 0.387) were not significantly different between the <8-mm and ≥8-mm overhang groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic IPFL provided satisfactory outcomes for patients with IPI, independent of the magnitude of acetabular overhang. IPFL should be considered for first-line surgical management of IPI refractory to nonoperative management, even in the setting of substantial acetabular overhang, given positive outcomes and low rates of subsequent acetabular revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Featured in the 2026-10-12 issue.

← Ten-year insert wear and the migration of uncemented tibial a…

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.